Monday, July 30, 2012

Viral Letter (from The Patriot Post) in Support of Chick-fil-A


The following letter can be found on The Patriot Post. In only a few hours, the letter has received over 2000 signatures and I expect it to reach over 100,000 within a couple days. After 32 states have voted to protect the traditional definition of marriage, and with the latest attacks on Chick-fil-A, it is evident, America is awake. Add your voice and sign the letter. Letter below (as posted on The Patriot Post):

Liberals v Companies That Operate With Christian Family Values

We hereby declare our support for the executives, franchise owners and more than 61,000 employees of Chick-fil-A for their Christian business practices, as well as their stated support for biblical values, which is to say traditional American family values.

The restaurant chain is under assault for remarks made by CEO Dan Cathy, who said, "We are very much supportive of the family -- the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business ... and we give God thanks for that."


The mayors of some of America's largest cities, including Boston, Chicago and San Francisco, have made known their objection to Christian businesses, and they made clear their intent to make it difficult for Chick-fil-A to operate in their cities.

Typical of those objections was this proclamation by Chicago's Rahm Emanuel: "Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values." (Apparently, Chicago values include becoming the murder capital of the nation, while hosting Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, the Christian-hating race baiter who, ironically, opposes same-sex marriage.)

In response, we, the undersigned, declare our support for any business that operates with Christian values. Accordingly we also declare a boycott against tourism or business conventions in any city that declares its opposition to such Christian owned and operated businesses.

Add your voice and GO HERE TO SIGN

Also you can send a Thank You Letter to Chick-fil-A using this template (over 12,000 sent so far).

Also, don't forget to eat at Chick-fil-A on August 1st, "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day", and show your support for our First Amendment. Join the facebook event (over 480,000 people have already confirmed attendance!).

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Save My Terry Bean Ad on YouTube!!!

Terry Bean saw my ad on YouTube, which exposes him (and Obama), and filed a "privacy" complaint because I used his full name, which I cut and pasted from Wikipedia! Leave it to the founder of Human Rights Campaign to file a complaint - the most complaining organization in the world. YouTube is trying to remove my video, even though it has 41 LIKES and 2 dislikes (a 95% approval rating) and over 500 views the first day. Go on YouTube and write a comment on the video telling YouTube we will not accept illegal censorship. This is NEWS and Americans have a right to know who Terry Bean is, a man who is a close confidant to the highest office of our country:


Thank you!





This is the rebuttal I sent to youtube:

The following disclaimer is in the video comments:
"FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law."
All material within this video is permitted use under said U.S.C Title 107. At 10 seconds in this video you see "Terry" Bean's full name, "Terrence Patrick 'Terry' Bean". This is previously published information and it was cut and pasted DIRECTLY from Wikipedia. This link is also provided directly, as a hyperlink, in the youtube video description. If you go to Brad Pitt's Wikipedia page, for example, it states "William Bradley 'Brad' Pitt". It is not against the law to publish full names (especially of public figures), and this is standard policy with Wikipedia - to publish full names first and foremost.
No laws have been broken, privacy or otherwise. I do not need Terry Bean's permission to use his full name, especially when the President holds him as a high confidant.

Bottom line: this video is NEWS, as are ALL videos on my channel.  If you look at the comments on the video you will also see several users stating that the video not be impeded in any way by YouTube or anyone else, as it is news, and as it is the truth.
Though the following is not needed to defend my use of Mr. Beans name, it is provided as a courtesy only for additional explanation:
President Obama, not me, called Terry out by name and thanked him emphatically. The American people, therefore, have a right to know who Terry Bean is, as he is closely associated with the highest office of our country.
Of course Mr. Bean is upset at my video because it exposes who he is and I have not lied. I have taken my information directly from Wikipedia (on which site the subjects, in this case, Terry Bean, have input into their own pages; thus, if Terry was really concerned about his full name being published, he would have long since had it removed from Wikipedia). What Terry is concerned about is having his name connected to $10 Million in gay male porn production per year and once again, I lie not. I actually took further information from a Huffington Post article previously published and used under Fair Use (link also provided in the youtube description). This article is actually rebutting the accusation that Terry Bean was invovled in porn creation (it is in favor of Terry) and I added it to the description to give the info in an unbiased way. In said article, you will find the words of Bean Investments' spokesperson, "Terry Bean serves as the executor of the estate of Charles P. Holmes, an old friend." and again, "As a favor to his dying friend, Mr. Bean agreed to ensure that the proceeds were distributed to charities making life better for LGBT people". The spokesperson also asserts "Isn't Holmes the 'gay-porn kingpin,' in this scenario? Well, yes."
In other words, the article is acknowledging that Holmes was responsible for creating "more than 400 pornographic films... (as) one of the world's largest producers of gay pornography."
In my video, I do not accuse Terry of being directly responsible for the creation of said pornography, but I state truthfully he was the sole trustee to Mr. Holmes' estate (which estate was made from said pornography).
I also include the following in the youtube description:
"Did Terry Bean produce $10 Million in gay male porn? No, but you have to ask, his close friend (close enough to trust Terry to direct all his money) made Terry his Sole Trustee of his estate. Also, Terry is 'gay' himself, and the founder of Human Rights Campaign, the most vicious  'gay' rights activist organization in the world. So, you decide... Like I said, Associations are everything and Obama has the wrong ones."
On a side note, If you uphold Mr. Bean's "allegation" of "privacy" breach, then you shall likewise remove EVERY video on youtube with Mitt Romney's full name in it, "Willard Mitt Romney", which you have not done. Mitt's not worried because he has nothing to hide. Mr. Bean does.
Thank you for your time.

Friday, July 27, 2012

NEW Viral Romney Ad: Still Voting For Obama?

Watch my latest viral Romney Ad that is blowing up on YouTube and we'll see if you know anyone who will still vote for Obama. Please LIKE, share, and subscribe on YouTube:


Check out my other two viral ads on my Ads Page here.

GOD SAVE THE USA 2012

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Demonizing Religion - Heroizing A Lie (homosexuality)


The following is a facebook post I made today addressing the issue of "gay marriage" in the United States:

"The 'separation of church and state' doctrine is a misinterpretation of the (U.S.) Constitution. The First Amendment... aims at forbidding all government-sponsored coercion of religious conscience. It does NOT forbid all religious influence upon politics or society." - Alan Keyes.

Indeed nearly all major positive evolution in society has been tied to religion - Martin Luther King Jr. was himself a minister of religion - a Christian. And we cannot be so disillusioned to believe that Martin Luther King Jr. would be supporting the "gay" rights movement today - not so. King's niece, Alveta Scott King, said, “While I have met many FORMER homosexuals, I have yet to meet a former black.” The vast majority of the black community is highly offended that their civil rights movement is being hijacked by "gay" rights activists and used as a platform to shuffle "hate" labels on all people of faith in this country. Alveta hits the point right on the head - being homosexual is a choice. There is no evidence, scientifically or otherwise, that proves or even suggests that people are born "gay". To suggest that God would make someone that way is a gross fabrication, and highly offensive to God, who is full of perfect love. Everyone wants to be quick to pronounce, "I have many 'gay' friends," as if "gays" are some sort of valuable commodity or something. Hence Rahm Emanuel's outrages statement, "Gays are the next Jews of fundraising." And is it any coincidence that Rahm Emanuel is a confidant to Obama? Obama has raised multi-millions from wealthy gay donors since his endorsement of "gay" marriage... he is politically pandering, apparently the only thing Obama knows how to do. Michelle Malkin puts it better than I can:



Yes, I too have "gay" friends. I also have FORMERLY "gay" friends and one of them used to be in the heart of the "gay" rights activist campaign in charge of one of their "gay" magazines in San Francisco. She, also (a black woman) has since denounced her "gay" lifestyle and is now a Christian minister and runs a Christian magazine called Victory. In her latest issue she states "The homosexual political machine attached itself to a beautiful Black family who, with their help (and others), made it all the way to the Whitehouse. I understand how many of you feel. It makes me proud to see Barack & Michelle and their gorgeous girls crossing the front lawn in our nation's capital, but... this pretty picture has truly cost us far too much. Perhaps you feel like the gay marriage issue is not important to you or that it does not affect your family. Trust me, it will. Since the day Obama released his statement (endorsing gay marriage), you can already see the acceleration of the homosexual agenda attempting to take over every area of family life in the US and abroad. And when they get what they want, in all 50 US states, IT STILL WON'T BE ENOUGH. They are coming for the church... If we're silent on this issue, and take no action to push back, how will they know that this (the 'gay' movement) was all based on a lie? The notion that gays are 'born' that way is a complete fabrication and they know it. There is not one shred of evidence to prove otherwise. Obama's statement may not have changed any laws, but it has and will continue to change attitudes. He's made it much easier for our youth to consider that it is perfectly normal to marry a man OR a woman."

This same friend told me, when she renounced homosexuality, those "gay" activist "friends" (whom she had worked hand in hand with for over 8 years) denounced her publicly (in major news sources; because they control them) as a liar and a worthless person. The "gay" political machine tried to absolutely destroy her in every possible way and also attempted to make it impossible for her to obtain employment! Now you tell me, is that love? Is that acceptance? Is that TOLERANCE from those who demand the same? I answer NO. THAT is hate. That is envy. That is the Destroyer at work, who wants all to be miserable like himself.

Now, the happy ending... this friend, on about the third day, was about to sink into despair and ruin when, to her great surprise, her email inbox was flooded - overwhelmingly flooded - with emails from thousands of Christians and people of faith all over the country who expressed their love for her, their appreciation for her decision, and their respect for her life change. They did not accuse her of the egregious "sin" of homosexuality but rather stood with open arms of love and acceptance to receive her.

Lastly, the "gay issue" is not about allowing people to live as they please - that is fine. The "gay issue" is about changing the legal definition of marriage, which will send a tidal wave through our laws and make a person of faith, who believes in the Bible; from which are taken the 10 commandments engraved on the steps of our US Supreme Court and from which our motto is taken "In God We Trust"; it will make people of faith criminals. And don't tell me it won't - it absolutely will and already is. Chick-fil-A is just one example of government censorship that is being accepted in this country. Chick-fil-A has done NOTHING illegal, yet they are being discriminated for expressing their constitutionally-protected beliefs. Are there many nice and fantastic "gay" people? YES, most of them are very kind and good people, just caught up in the lie, however this is the voice of the homosexual movement so vocally and publicly familiar... I give you... Obama adviser, Dan Savage demonizing the Bible while addressing HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS!


I am supremely respectful to all the students who had the courage to walk out of Savage's SAVAGE blasphemy of the Holy Bible.

Now, let this inspire you to support our next President, Mitt Romney, who will put this nation back on course:



Please share your thoughts... but no "bigotry" will be tolerated in the comments. Thanks

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Debunking False Labels of "Bigotry" Against Chick-fil-A

I posted the following screen shot on my facebook page today because I was so upset at what Human Rights Campaign had posted on their landing page:



"Is this America??? Is. This. AMERICA??? How far we have come when the meaning of the word bigotry is blindly applied to a ballot-supported majority, while the elitist-supported minority seething the word are the very ones committing the atrocity. Right on the home page of Human Rights Campaign you will find Chick-fil-A blacklisted for expressing their family-owned business' BELIEFS. Bigotry is 'a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.' The very act of bigotry is an act of aggression - meaning it is an act UPON a belief which has been already expressed. Someone expressing their BELIEF is not the one committing bigotry, but rather the people who descend like wolves to tear that belief down, to express "utter intolerance" for, or to "hate" upon that previously expressed belief who are committing bigotry."

This is the caption I added to the screen shot I posted:

"Target, General Mills, Starbucks, Oreo, etc. have all donated money to homosexual activist campaigns, yet none of them have received the absolute bigotry that Chick-fil-A has been the recipient of. STOP illegal blacklisting and censorship THIS IS AMERICA and the First Amendment still lives!!"

Don't believe the majority of America doesn't support Chick-fil-A's stance either... remember , 32 states have already voted to uphold traditional marriage. Chick-fil-A has more facebook fans than any fast food restaurant I have ever seen, over 5.2 million, and they have gained over 100,000 new fans since they expressed their support for traditional marriage a week ago! God bless Chick-fil-A for their courage in the face of such bigotry - good for them!

Here's a photo of our local Chick-fil-A, taken today, national eat at Chick-fil-A day packed to capacity!



Dan Cathy's official words:

"(We support) the biblical definition of the family unit. I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, 'We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage. I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about."

Even the LA Times, a liberal newspaper which disagrees with Cathy's stance, has defended Chick-fil-A against this unlawful suppression of Free Speech, saying:

"It was the freedom to express politically unpopular views and to oppose such views that the Founding Fathers fought to establish... As both a private citizen and a prominent public figure, Menino is welcome to abstain from fried chicken sandwiches and urge others to do likewise. It's a different matter if he attempts to trample the free-speech rights of others by using the power of his office to fight against a business license for Chick-fil-A." (emphasis added)

Chick-fil-A doesn't deny "gays" equal eating privileges in their restaurants, nor does it deny "gays" employment with their company - they have done NOTHING against the law. Nothing. We must speak out against all forms of unlawful oppression, even - and especially - when it comes from the very group claiming to be oppressed.

Please share your thoughts but no "bigotry" will be tolerated ;)